Skip to main content

Stanisław Lem

I'm going to be reading The Cyberiad by Stanisław Lem for my Sci-fi book club. I will write my thoughts as I get into this book here. My blogs are notes that are not finished on publication, I keep updating them, so don't be surprised if you come back to a post and it's been added too and edited, hopefully for the better. I should start a blog called Rough Drafts. 

The introduction writes “ Soviet medicine was dominated by the eugenic theories of Trofim Lysenko,”

Google writes, “ No, Soviet medicine was not dominated by eugenic theories, but rather by Lysenkoism, a discredited biological theory championed by Trofim Lysenko. Lysenkoism, which focused on environmentally induced, heritable traits, had a detrimental impact on Soviet genetics and agriculture, but was not directly related to eugenics. While eugenics did exist in the Soviet Union, it was not the dominant ideology in medicine, and Lysenkoism was a separate and distinct phenomenon.”

So OK. No doubt Google has swerved right lately, but it also feels like an overstatement in the introduction too. 


First through, similar to Lewis Carroll in taking things to their logical end, with a George Orwell overlay. I feel like the above machines where 2+2=7 is a political machine. 

There's also a steampunk element. Machines everywhere, workshops, mechanics.

King Atrocious--there's a obvious naming trend in modern times. Viscous in Cowboy Bebop. 



Links to posts about The Cyberiad and Stanislaw Lem:

Osvaldo Simeone

Wikipedia bio of Lem

Wikipedia on The Cyberiad


Last updated 8/8/25. 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review
Post a Comment
Read more

AOC

Dark Brandon meet Dark Alex. I see her advising the republicans to stick to their guns and never compromise. They don’t want to do anything, only obstruct. So they don’t actually need to be unified. Chaos isn’t organized. This is fine. Read all about it from Heather Cox Richardson , a historian who covers current events. "As their policies threatened to lose voters by concentrating wealth upward and hollowing out the middle class, Republicans increasingly warned that minority voters wanted socialism and were destroying the nation to get it. Trump rode that narrative to power, and now tearing down the current government is the idea that drives the Republican base." While we're at it, here's another funny photo from the Onion: And then: I listened to the Times podcast about George Santos . He basically lied about, I don't know, 80% of his resume, and has a mysterious $700k in his "corporation" which has no clients. So he's a Russian or Chinese plant, o...
Post a Comment
Read more

The case for Harris

Motley Kamuka Blog endorses Kamala Harris. In general, Trump just wants to lower taxes on the rich, and do nothing, sell whatever influence he can to line his pockets. Apparently the emoluments clause in the constitution has no teeth. Harris has a set of ideas about policy that are fairly middle of the road. In most countries she's would be seen as a centrist. Spin about her radical agendas are exaggerated.  I'm not sure how he got past " grab them by the pussy ", but he did and here we are. Women: Obviously the idea of giving women pregnancy tests at the borders of the state, and then if they come back and don't have a baby, they go to jail, isn't really what most women want. Pick Harris.  I understand if you think abortion is murder, maybe you've been told that by the Catholic church, which has the same ideal of Buddhism that you don't kill--so follow your religion for yourself. Not everyone is Christian or Buddhist or even has a religion. Women are ...
Post a Comment
Read more