Skip to main content

hearing different voices

I think people are sick if they think they can bring about a better result for Israel and Palestinians, by not voting for Harris. 

Trump would undoubtedly align with the far right Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom it's suspected that he violated the Logan Act, add that to his criminal tab of seemingly endless law breaking and potential law breaking and suspected law breaking.

The Palestinians-Americans frustration at not getting more traction with the Democratic party, could be seen as the party just not wanting to take on this fight now. They're trying to consolidate power behind Harris in the quick election drive to November. 

I'm not sure they couldn't allow for 2 speeches, one by a Palestinian and one by someone who defends the Israeli side. Just to say we recognize the issues that exist and we give it free expression. We're not so uptight about conflict and dissension within our own party. Heck it might have drawn more eyeballs, but of course it's a no win situation, so it also could have been damaging and risky. I'm sure that's why it didn't make it. Make a speech outside the convention if you like. And that's what someone did. Here is one. The war rages here in America no matter what image the Democratic party wants to put forward.


I'm almost scared to write about it. I imagine hundreds of critics in the wings ready to pounce on every inexactitude and notion. I wrote about it when it happened. I wasn't lynched for trying to see both sides.


Like the situation, I'm of two minds.

I can see why Israel wants to snuff out Hamas from it's own territory. With Hezbollah lobbing bombs from Lebanon, Iran lobbing bombs from their country, and bombs coming from Jordan from the PLO, that they would at least feel like they could eliminate the threat inside the country that is lobbing bombs on the people of Israel, including Palestinians, Bedouins, and Jewish Israeli. They have an intense desire to defend a country where being Jewish can't be a problem, after suffering from so much persecution in other countries. 

If 6 million Jews were murdered during WW2, leaving 11 million left, you could see how a race of historic people would want to perhaps make sure no more were murdered. The bullied becomes a bully, and unleashed in this situation. That's the horrible Hamas calculation, to paint Israel as unreasonable, but who could get over the bombing? Why should Israel just take it? (The answer is genocide is not really indicated, just be more careful to get the Hamas people, of which there can't be that many left.)

I have read about how they are taking great pains to reduce the number of civilian casualties. I'm not sure that isn't just portraying one side, because there's other information about innocent people being killed, and journalist being killed. 

Outside the two state or one state solution debate, the rejection by Yasser Arafat of peace in 2002, there is also the larger context of the desire to disrupt peace by those who gain from war, even losing war. The axis of western democracies is broken up by Russia, even if it can't win the war in Ukraine. Making war stops their fears of Nato encircling Russia, their worst fears. Iran is happy to disrupt the region with their vision of what the world should look like. So in that context, waging a losing war was a win for Hamas because now Israel is painted as a brutal and horrible regime, not the one democracy in the region. 

Israel and Saudi Arabia were looking towards regularizing diplomatic relations when this war broke out, and of course that has been put on hold indefinitely. So while I can't fully parse how people win by waging a losing war, I see how the disruption could profit some. 


On the other hand, innocent people are dying and as a human being, I can't abide it. Whatever mishegas Israel puts forward to justify Gaza Palestinian genocide, well, you can't actually justify genocide. It doesn't matter how uppity and difficult a minority is. You have to take responsibility for this situation. Try waging peace more. 

The failure to bring into the fold people in the peace process is Israel's, even with Yasser Arafat's failure to find peace. Palestinians need to be more peaceful, and Israel needs to cultivate that in the community by developing it. That is if there are any left.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Character list of Inherent Vice the novel

Fay "Shasta" Hepworth played by Katherine Waterston in the 2014 movie Larry "Doc" Sportello: Our hero, gumsandal.  Shasta Fay Hepworth: Former beautiful love interest. Mickey Wolfmann: Real estate tycoon, Shasta's sugar daddy, paying for apartment in Hancock Park. Mrs. Sloane Wolfmann: wife. Has her own side piece Mr. Riggs Warbling Deputy DA Penny Kimball: lawyer from district attorney office, who fooled around with Doc for a time. Works next to Rhus Frothingham (female book, male in movie).  Aunt Reet: Aunt in real estate. "Bigfoot" Christian Bjornsen: Hollywood detective and actor. Married to Chastity. Spoiler: His partner Vincent Indelicato is wacked by Adrian Prussia, but Puck did the actual job. Mrs. Chastity Bjornsen: Gets on the phone on page 260 of the paperback to defend Bigfoot's day off from work. Calls Doc Mr. Moral Turpitude, accuses him of running up Bigfoot's mental health bills.  Denis: friend who he goes and gets a pizza with

Democracy or democrazy?

Admittedly the choice between corrupt democrats and corrupt republicans isn't the political choice I want. I'd rather vote my way towards fairness, elimination of poverty, anti-trust laws that fight the consolidation of corporations (you read about grocery stores lately?), education, infrastructure. What you do get is a vote for democrats that vote to end rail strikes ( source ) because they can't carve out of the profits a sick leave, versus reality denying, Russian bought, obstructionists who might lower taxes, and want smaller government. The Ron Swanson's of the world who hate government and work in government. I've been running into people who believe the corrupt choices aren't worth even making. Reasons not to pay attention.I've thought that a few times in my life, but I don't think that now.  There are real choices about health care for women, and even just an attitude towards democracy. It's hard to fight past the rhetoric, and understand eve

Consent

You couldn't have a better title to a memoir in these times. You can read about Humbert Humbert, and other male narratives, but the female narrative of the statutory rape is fulfilled by this book. I feel slightly ill while reading this book. What she goes through is off, and it's hard to put a finger on it besides  Hebephilia . All the collaborating details from her mother, to her doctors, to her father. Vanessa Springora will be remembered for other things, she is a director and a publisher. I'm not sure if  Gabriel Matzneff will be remembered for other things. At least not on this side of the pond. I do have a kind of jealousy for the appreciation of the intellectual life in France.  Matzneff cites Lewis Carroll , and others as having the appreciation for youth. I read his Wikipedia page. That led to other questions about photographers who take pictures of their children. That led me down a creepy path. As much as Springora tries to not make it sexy, I wonder how many