Skip to main content

Paul Auster is no longer with us



I read his New York Trilogy and almost every book that came out after it. I saw him read once at a bookstore. I recently just read his latest novel Baumgartner. I didn't read his novel about his dog. And I looked over the list, and I haven't read Man In The Dark. I read his poetry, and his wife's novels, even a book his sister-in-law wrote about hysteria that was brilliant. You can listen to his daughter's music on Spotify. I've seen his movies Smoke (1995) and Blue In The Face (1995). We lost a great man today.

I'm learning about his today, it's a shame we wait till people die to talk about them. I didn't know he was next to someone who was struck by lightning and died.


Links:

NY Times (Obit)

Reddit (r/TrueLit): 

"...he got this combination of postmodern games and simplicity of language from the French nouveau roman, especially from Michel Butor and Alain Robbe-Grillet. All the books in the New York Trilogy are basically nouveaux romans in English, and he's probably the author who did the most to carry that influence across the Atlantic. Which also explains why he's so popular in France." (source)

Wikipedia biography

NPR by Tom Vitale

Guardian (photos). Died of lung cancer complications, see his smoking a lot in photos.

Guardian (Other writers comments)

Guardian (Auster quotes): "‘Postmodern’ is a term I don’t understand … there’s an arrogance to all this labelling, a self-assurance that I find to be distasteful, if not dishonest. I try to be humble in the face of my own confusions, and I don’t want to elevate my doubts to some status they don’t deserve. I’m really stumbling. I’m really in the dark. I don’t know. And if that – what I would call honesty – qualifies as postmodern, then OK, but it’s not as if I ever wanted to write a book that sounded like John Barth or Robert Coover."

Guardian (Obit)

Guardian (review of Baumgartner)

Lucy Sante in NY Times: "Paul was fascinated by 19th-century melodrama, with its preposterous coincidences and bifurcating plots; by the avant-garde adaptation of such popular literary tropes in the early 20th century by authors like Alfred Jarry and Raymond Roussel; and by the systematic application of constraints in the writing process by Georges Perec and the Oulipo group in the 1960s and ’70s.

He was very French in his orientation — and the French repaid the favor, according him pop-star status. His books were sold in supermarkets there.

He also nailed a certain flavor of timeless French romantic melancholy, hence his affinities with the novels of Patrick Modiano and the drawings of Pierre Le-Tan. But Paul’s work was always all about story, about that feeling of being actually transported by reading."

NY Times book recommendations.

BBC Video (2021)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

movie versus book

I'm watching the movie a second time, and I'm halfway through the book. Among the movie's differences from the book. Sortilege starts off narrating. The movie doesn't have the school bell for the phone either, just a regular ring. It's really weird the way Doc shouts when he sees the photo of Amethyst as a baby. I guess it's to dramatize the negative impact of being pregnant and using, but the child we see looks pretty healthy. The child doesn't huff out because they're boring like she did in the book.  Superficially The Big Lebowski and Inherent Vice are similar but it's a completely different style of narrative. The Coen brothers are amazing, they have a very witty movie that I have loved for a long time. Pynchon is a whole other realm of fiction, and this conversion is fairly faithful, taking out the best lines and making it more compact. The audio book is 15 hours, the movie is 2 hours. Anyway, I like the different movies for different reasons. T...

Introduction

Robert B. Palmer's introduction to his translation of Walter F. Otto's Dionysus: Myth and Cult (p. ix-xi) Gods of Hellas, gods of Hellas, Can ye listen in your silence? Can your mystic voices tell us Where ye hide? In floating islands,  With a wind that evermore Keeps you out of sight of shore?                                     Pan, Pan is dead. ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING The Dead Pan W H E N Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote these lines which sound so pessimistic and so limited to any lover of the beauty and truth of Greek mythology, she had in mind a famous passage out of Plutarch's De Oraculorum defectu {Mor. 419 A-E) in which it was reported on good authority that Pan had died. But let Plutarch tell the story (Philip is speaking):  As for death among such beings [i.e., deities], I have heard the words of a man who was not a fool nor an impostor. The father of...