Skip to main content

Feeling political



When I was growing up the Republicans were shady, but they seemed to have some integrity. Nixon, Reagan, Bushs. 

Trump proved that people with a conservative orientation in their psychology and personality don't actually care about ethics, and the country over their ideology and culture war crap. Party over country. They align with Russia sometimes.

The NY Post hates an autocratic young female actress, but not for a leader of the country. So they don't like misbehavior, they just don't like it when it goes against their prejudices. 

Woke turns out to be a one size fit all space to put your shameful ideas: racism, fascism, sexism, selfishness. Woke is the forces that fight injustice, destroying the planet, thinking about others.

The people I actually like who vote republican aren't racist, sexist, undemocratic, but they feel the right to vote against others and their future. Selfish. Maybe humans are psychologically selfish, and the factors that make them less selfish are waning, but it just makes sense for the government, which is thinking about everyone, not to be selfish. 

I'm not against democratic forces trying to keep taxes in check, even lowering them. When I play SimCity, I eventually lower taxes and the economy takes off. When I've built a basic level of infrastructure. And I never go into debt, that kills the government. Republicans preach fiscal responsibility but don't believe in it. They pretend to love life, but their stance on gun control is directly the opposite.

Does the other side see the importance of democracy and the interplay of ideas? Their communication style and choices says no. OK, ignore the culture wars crap. There are rational thought processes underneath many conservatives, and it's true that there are limits to government. How do we discuss this, and recover democratic dialogue?


In The Purge episode of Rick and Morty (S2E9) society has an outlet. Once a year at sundown you can kill anyone you want. There are many movies and versions of this idea. I would say Hunger Games is also a version of this. Sports are a version of this too, simulated war that doesn't harm anyone. Except American football, that permanently maims people. That's more like cock fighting and bull fighting where animals die. Supposedly Spain, France, Portugal, Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, and Ecuador still have bullfighting (source). Jung would say we pay a price when we disown a part of ourselves that is fighting to get out.

Is culture wars a kind of purge urge, where fighting about personality and ways of seeing the world battle against each other in the town square of social media? I don't really experience it as good bloodsport, and I think it's why a lot of people turn politically apathetic. Turning away allows for the George Santos, MTG and other obviously corrupt politicians to exist, but they serve a function for republicans because they don't believe in government and will vote for people to wreck it up, out of spite.

There is no two meeting of the political poles of activism and passificsm. The dialectical dance, and just doing the obvious right thing, seeing all the factors. If you're really looking closely, you don't need an abstract ideology to guide you. Decriminalizing addiction works huge, but isn't as gratifying to the judgmental and anti-woke types. It's almost like Republicans don't want government to work, they want people murdered with guns, toxic ecological disasters, banking system collapse. It feels like the fight between good and evil for me. It's not wonder Lindy Li has started calling the opposing side satan.  

It's like loving the country over party, which seems to be in short supply these days. You can read about how Connally actively sabotaged the hostages coming back from Iran to sabotage Carter's re-election. Feels unAmerican to me, but seems almost standard these days. Play with people's lives, the ends justify the means bullshit. Barnes has an Atwater type confession. Atwater regretted his ethics on his deathbed. Too late, sorry, learn to have ethics before you die, please. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Character list of Inherent Vice the novel

Fay "Shasta" Hepworth played by Katherine Waterston in the 2014 movie Larry "Doc" Sportello: Our hero, gumsandal.  Shasta Fay Hepworth: Former beautiful love interest. Mickey Wolfmann: Real estate tycoon, Shasta's sugar daddy, paying for apartment in Hancock Park. Mrs. Sloane Wolfmann: wife. Has her own side piece Mr. Riggs Warbling Deputy DA Penny Kimball: lawyer from district attorney office, who fooled around with Doc for a time. Works next to Rhus Frothingham (female book, male in movie).  Aunt Reet: Aunt in real estate. "Bigfoot" Christian Bjornsen: Hollywood detective and actor. Married to Chastity. Spoiler: His partner Vincent Indelicato is wacked by Adrian Prussia, but Puck did the actual job. Mrs. Chastity Bjornsen: Gets on the phone on page 260 of the paperback to defend Bigfoot's day off from work. Calls Doc Mr. Moral Turpitude, accuses him of running up Bigfoot's mental health bills.  Denis: friend who he goes and gets a pizza with

Democracy or democrazy?

Admittedly the choice between corrupt democrats and corrupt republicans isn't the political choice I want. I'd rather vote my way towards fairness, elimination of poverty, anti-trust laws that fight the consolidation of corporations (you read about grocery stores lately?), education, infrastructure. What you do get is a vote for democrats that vote to end rail strikes ( source ) because they can't carve out of the profits a sick leave, versus reality denying, Russian bought, obstructionists who might lower taxes, and want smaller government. The Ron Swanson's of the world who hate government and work in government. I've been running into people who believe the corrupt choices aren't worth even making. Reasons not to pay attention.I've thought that a few times in my life, but I don't think that now.  There are real choices about health care for women, and even just an attitude towards democracy. It's hard to fight past the rhetoric, and understand eve

Consent

You couldn't have a better title to a memoir in these times. You can read about Humbert Humbert, and other male narratives, but the female narrative of the statutory rape is fulfilled by this book. I feel slightly ill while reading this book. What she goes through is off, and it's hard to put a finger on it besides  Hebephilia . All the collaborating details from her mother, to her doctors, to her father. Vanessa Springora will be remembered for other things, she is a director and a publisher. I'm not sure if  Gabriel Matzneff will be remembered for other things. At least not on this side of the pond. I do have a kind of jealousy for the appreciation of the intellectual life in France.  Matzneff cites Lewis Carroll , and others as having the appreciation for youth. I read his Wikipedia page. That led to other questions about photographers who take pictures of their children. That led me down a creepy path. As much as Springora tries to not make it sexy, I wonder how many