Skip to main content

Why be political?

Why be political in the USA?

1. Global warming: I have a smart friend who at one time provocatively said that he wasn't sure humans had an influence. He now says he's glad he doesn't have children, so he doesn't have to worry beyond his lifetime. He sounds cold but he's a warm vegan. It's a political stance to say "I don't care about global warming" because you don't want your "freedoms" to be curbed. I'd like the freedom for my children to deal with less global warming problems. Let's do some smart things for the future.

2. Democracy: One party's strategy actually is to curb participation. While New Zealand wants to lower the age of voting, Republicans want to raise the age for voting. The spurious claims of stolen elections undermine democracy. Just like illocutionary prejudice leads to violence against people, so does anti-democratic words. 

3. It’s not the Autonomous States of America. I get it that people don’t want things done, that is the first question: do something? Fiscal responsibility would be a good plan for Republicans if they were not the most irresponsible. They run up the debt more than Democrats who work it down. Being against taxation is a profoundly nihilistic thing to want in my opinion. Trump isn't smart for not paying taxes. He's an asshole. The whole try to get away with whatever you can get away with is more than annoying to me, it's murderous. Republicans can't impress their Christian nationalism on the nation, so they want some states. I could go on and on about how anti-federalism harms us, but one example is education where poor school districts have terrible schools. Basically the poor get shitty schools. That's not America to me. 

From HCR, a historian of the restoration in the USA, "Southern leaders wanted to destroy the United States of America and create their own country, based not in the traditional American idea that “all men are created equal,” but rather in its opposite: that some men were better than others and had the right to enslave their neighbors. In the 1850s, convinced that society worked best if a few wealthy men ran it, southern leaders had bent the laws of the United States to their benefit, using it to protect enslavement above all."

4. Some political rhetoric increases violence. The politicians don't say go out and kill gay people, but they create an environment where it becomes more permissible. Both the political setting and the availability of arms creates an environment that is complicit with terrible mass murders. One party gets a lot of money from gun manufacturers and their proxy. Pick your party carefully.  

5. What if there were consequences for citizens for the lack of gun safety? What if corporation couldn't donate to candidates? Here are the candidates that took money from the NRA:

$104,456 Rand Paul
$176,274 Ted Cruz
$226,007 Chuck Grassley
$1,267,139 Mitch McConnell
$1,269,486 Ron Johnson
$1,306,130 Marsha Blackburn
$1,391,548 Josh Hawley
$3,303,355 Marco Rubio
$13,647,676 Mitt Romney

What it if became unacceptable to vote those politicians in.

6. The right of women to choose to terminate fetus that are not viable, meaning they won't live once they are born, is curbed based on confusion and control issues. One party is in favor of that. One party has narrowly viewed issues to control women. The historical context of that alarming. 

Tuning out helps global warming, undermines democracy, literally kills people. 

Paying attention and voting is the hope.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

The case for Harris

Motley Kamuka Blog endorses Kamala Harris. In general, Trump just wants to lower taxes on the rich, and do nothing, sell whatever influence he can to line his pockets. Apparently the emoluments clause in the constitution has no teeth. Harris has a set of ideas about policy that are fairly middle of the road. In most countries she's would be seen as a centrist. Spin about her radical agendas are exaggerated.  I'm not sure how he got past " grab them by the pussy ", but he did and here we are. Women: Obviously the idea of giving women pregnancy tests at the borders of the state, and then if they come back and don't have a baby, they go to jail, isn't really what most women want. Pick Harris.  I understand if you think abortion is murder, maybe you've been told that by the Catholic church, which has the same ideal of Buddhism that you don't kill--so follow your religion for yourself. Not everyone is Christian or Buddhist or even has a religion. Women are ...

Gravity's Rainbow Notes Franz Pokler

From pp 397-433: Franz Pokler , a German rocket scientist. He is marginally associated with early attempts to develop rockets in the 1920's. During the war, Weissmann controls Pokler, giving him routine assignments and keeping him in line by allowing him yearly visits from a girl who he says is Pokler's daughter. The girl spends the rest of the year in a concentration camp, and Weissmann's implied threat is that she will be killed if Pokler fails to cooperate with Weissmann's scheme. Weissmann's purpose is to use Pokler to make one small part for the A4 rocket. In the end, having performed his task, Pokler is released; Slothrop meets him living quietly in the ruins of a children's village after the end of the war. His daughter also survives. Wiki notes on the Franz Pokler section 397-433 Abstract of "Franz Pökler's Anti-Story: Narrative and Self in Gravity's Rainbow" by Robert L. McLaughlin. (access the article  here  from  Pynchon Notes ) Gra...