Skip to main content

Inherent Vice article

Jim Ruland in Alta writes: "“For the old guard,” Carswell explained, “Pynchon was validation for literary criticism because you can’t read it by yourself.”"

I guess with the internet you can glean enough background, the reading groups on r/ThomasPynchon was very helpful. Also being older helps.

Also, "Justin St. Clair, associate professor of English at the University of South Alabama, takes the argument one step further: “This may be heresy,” he says, “but I think I like the movie better than the book.”"

Also, "For Reilly, it ignores the most important aspect of the book: the many and varied references to the Manson Family. Set in the period between the Tate-LaBianca murders and the Manson trial, the novel captures the moment when Californians lost faith in the counterculture."

I really need to watch Once Upon A Time In Hollywood. I recently watched Under The Silver Lake, and found it interesting. Had lots of naked women prancing around the screen, and can comment on the male gaze at the same time, so you know, it's an aware flesh film.

"His analysis clarified my belief that any attempt to adapt Pynchon would ultimately fail because there’s too much going on beneath the surface."

I think a movie doesn't have to compare itself to the book because they're two different mediums. For all the love I feel for a text, I can still see the movie as a separate entity, and relish the scene in the rain where they're really in love, or Jaquine's yelling at the photo of the baby when she was a heroin addict. There was a feeling like showing her healthy now is kind of a lie, but I guess a lot of film makers decide to Hollywood out of realism, and just dip into it with their own witty commentary.


"Inherent Vice opens with an epigraph: “Under the paving stones, the beach.” It’s a slogan made popular during the uprisings in France in May 1968. The beach refers to the sand underneath the paving stones that the students dug up and threw at the police. For Pynchon, what lies beneath the surface has always been a source of fascination."

I asked a woman visiting from Minnesota, what was the tribe that used to be on the lands she lives and works on. She said some version of the Sioux, and there was migration west as we became aware of them in writing so it's confusing to be more specific. 

I live on Matinecock land, Flushing bay. Willow creek was turned into Willow Lake, and that's the nearest lovely spot for me to walk to. 

The Tongva were the tribe that were along the California coast.

Fascinating, I didn't know: "Thanks to Senate Bill 796, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law in September 2021, the land, known as Bruce’s Beach, will be returned to the descendants of Charles and Willa Bruce, the owners who were forced to abandon their property just as Doc describes." They didn't just run off natives, they also ran off blacks.

Anyway, fascinating article.


Bonus: Interesting article from 2006: The Thomas Pynchon affair by Ian Rankin. He wrote his dissertation on Pynchon's short stories. Fun article.

"Pynchon seemed to fit the model I was learning of literature as an extended code or grail quest. Moreover, he was like a drug: as you worked out one layer of meaning, you quickly wanted to move to the next. He wrote action novels about spies and soldiers that also happened to be detective stories and bawdy romps.

His books were picaresquely post-modern and his humour was Marxian (tendance: Groucho). On page six of The Crying of Lot 49, the name Quackenbush appears, and you know you are in safely comedic hands."


Later, "With his playfulness (what Barthes would doubtless have called jouissance) and his codifying tactics, he seemed the writer that deconstruction and its ilk had been waiting for. An undergrad could compose a 1000-word essay on the ramifications of the title of the law firm in the opening pages of Lot 49 (Warpe, Wistfull, Kubitschek and McMingus, in case you were wondering).

I found Pynchon Notes, a journal that ran from 1979-2009.


Surprising ranking on r/thomaaspynchon

4.60✩ - Gravity's Rainbow

4.54✩ - Mason & Dixon

4.27✩ - Against the Day

3.86✩ - The Crying of Lot 49

3.86✩ - Inherent Vice

3.81✩ - V.

3.64✩ - Bleeding Edge

3.62✩ - Vineland


Google offer up to me a 2021 blog post about Vineland.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Character list of Inherent Vice the novel

Fay "Shasta" Hepworth played by Katherine Waterston in the 2014 movie Larry "Doc" Sportello: Our hero, gumsandal.  Shasta Fay Hepworth: Former beautiful love interest. Mickey Wolfmann: Real estate tycoon, Shasta's sugar daddy, paying for apartment in Hancock Park. Mrs. Sloane Wolfmann: wife. Has her own side piece Mr. Riggs Warbling Deputy DA Penny Kimball: lawyer from district attorney office, who fooled around with Doc for a time. Works next to Rhus Frothingham (female book, male in movie).  Aunt Reet: Aunt in real estate. "Bigfoot" Christian Bjornsen: Hollywood detective and actor. Married to Chastity. Spoiler: His partner Vincent Indelicato is wacked by Adrian Prussia, but Puck did the actual job. Mrs. Chastity Bjornsen: Gets on the phone on page 260 of the paperback to defend Bigfoot's day off from work. Calls Doc Mr. Moral Turpitude, accuses him of running up Bigfoot's mental health bills.  Denis: friend who he goes and gets a pizza with

Democracy or democrazy?

Admittedly the choice between corrupt democrats and corrupt republicans isn't the political choice I want. I'd rather vote my way towards fairness, elimination of poverty, anti-trust laws that fight the consolidation of corporations (you read about grocery stores lately?), education, infrastructure. What you do get is a vote for democrats that vote to end rail strikes ( source ) because they can't carve out of the profits a sick leave, versus reality denying, Russian bought, obstructionists who might lower taxes, and want smaller government. The Ron Swanson's of the world who hate government and work in government. I've been running into people who believe the corrupt choices aren't worth even making. Reasons not to pay attention.I've thought that a few times in my life, but I don't think that now.  There are real choices about health care for women, and even just an attitude towards democracy. It's hard to fight past the rhetoric, and understand eve

Consent

You couldn't have a better title to a memoir in these times. You can read about Humbert Humbert, and other male narratives, but the female narrative of the statutory rape is fulfilled by this book. I feel slightly ill while reading this book. What she goes through is off, and it's hard to put a finger on it besides  Hebephilia . All the collaborating details from her mother, to her doctors, to her father. Vanessa Springora will be remembered for other things, she is a director and a publisher. I'm not sure if  Gabriel Matzneff will be remembered for other things. At least not on this side of the pond. I do have a kind of jealousy for the appreciation of the intellectual life in France.  Matzneff cites Lewis Carroll , and others as having the appreciation for youth. I read his Wikipedia page. That led to other questions about photographers who take pictures of their children. That led me down a creepy path. As much as Springora tries to not make it sexy, I wonder how many