Skip to main content

Attention spans

I don't think social media or the internet are responsible for my skittish attention. It's being a parent. The constant needs of a child interrupt everything. Even though my daughter goes to school, I find myself switching from one thing to another as though she's around. 

The concentration of meditation can help one defrag their brain. Unlimited input, surfing the net, input all the time. I used to be a person who turned off TVs, but now I feel OK with them on all the time. Input input input.

I love taking baths and reading. I'm not going to drag my computer into the bathroom and I don't feel comfortable using my phone in the bath. A book can even be dropped, I've dropped a book into the bath before. You can dry it out, but it expands, so it's pretty much dead unless it's the last book on earth and then you'd preserve it. 

I've seen so much apocalyptic fiction that I imagine things from that perspective, like I can flip with other kinds of perspectives. 

The rampant and copious entertainment has also led to a kind of aesthetic pleasure seeking attitude. In my solitude I see out movies, shows, books, news, sports, it's all attempting to get my attention. What is truly interesting to me. 

I never reread anything or watched something over and over again until maybe a few years ago. I found shows that I liked, and watching them non-stop was what I did until I could find another show that engaged me. The characters are like friends, family. You know how grandpa would tell the same story over and over again. Well, my shows are like grandpa, going over the highlights, comforting and interesting narratives. Interesting narratives now hold up over rewatching. Maybe it's Clive Bell's significant form. At the time I read about significant form, I thought what? But it's the only explanation I can find for why certain shows grab me. 

In a way I don't even pay attention the first time watching a favorite show I'll watch over and over. I play chess or videos games on my phone and mostly listen. In a way the visuals are secondary to the dialogue, though I do look up when I have to. To get facial expressions, to see personnel. I don't really like action, that's boring to me at this point, it all seems so fake. It's visual fluff, so I can take my eyes off the screen.

The full up feeling of both video games and TV in the background is my crack. I resent having to eat, but eating and watching are also linked to me know. We used to watch the news during dinner as a family and my stepfather would rant at the TV. I disliked politics, it's taken me into my 50's to get that it's really frustrating to not get what you want, but that's part of democracy. People cheat and game the system to get around things to power grab, but the shred of democracy really helps, the illusion that you're participating. I vote, and who I vote for doesn't win. That's OK, I'll keep voting and paying attention. The terrible leaders we have is because we don't pay attention. The terrible leadership is fetishized by the abused, and thus the system keeps perpetuating itself. Just having normal human leaders is something a few countries have figured out. I want to move to New Zealand, or Canada. 

I'm really surprised Madison Cawthorn was voted out by his base in republican primaries. I didn't know a republican could do anything too bad, to lose his base. I thought the whole point was to disrupt government and make it not work. Lurid scandals draw attention.  

I'm going to say this too. The legalization of marijuana makes sense because drug use needs to be decriminalized. But it's not a pure win, because it's just been folded into capitalism and numbing oneself down from the capitalist grind. Come home from work exhausted and bewildered, and just lite it up so you can consume the bland entertainment, smoking gives you euphoria and makes things seem profound. They used to say Ambien wasn't habit forming and the ERs are filled with people seeking Ambien. Same with marijuana. It's not physically addictive, like you can die just quitting alcohol, but it's psychologically addictive because who doesn't want more euphoria. The biggest argument for me against smoking is that I couldn't really focus on reading Shakespeare. I'd rather read Shakespeare than smoke.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

movie versus book

I'm watching the movie a second time, and I'm halfway through the book. Among the movie's differences from the book. Sortilege starts off narrating. The movie doesn't have the school bell for the phone either, just a regular ring. It's really weird the way Doc shouts when he sees the photo of Amethyst as a baby. I guess it's to dramatize the negative impact of being pregnant and using, but the child we see looks pretty healthy. The child doesn't huff out because they're boring like she did in the book.  Superficially The Big Lebowski and Inherent Vice are similar but it's a completely different style of narrative. The Coen brothers are amazing, they have a very witty movie that I have loved for a long time. Pynchon is a whole other realm of fiction, and this conversion is fairly faithful, taking out the best lines and making it more compact. The audio book is 15 hours, the movie is 2 hours. Anyway, I like the different movies for different reasons. T...

Introduction

Robert B. Palmer's introduction to his translation of Walter F. Otto's Dionysus: Myth and Cult (p. ix-xi) Gods of Hellas, gods of Hellas, Can ye listen in your silence? Can your mystic voices tell us Where ye hide? In floating islands,  With a wind that evermore Keeps you out of sight of shore?                                     Pan, Pan is dead. ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING The Dead Pan W H E N Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote these lines which sound so pessimistic and so limited to any lover of the beauty and truth of Greek mythology, she had in mind a famous passage out of Plutarch's De Oraculorum defectu {Mor. 419 A-E) in which it was reported on good authority that Pan had died. But let Plutarch tell the story (Philip is speaking):  As for death among such beings [i.e., deities], I have heard the words of a man who was not a fool nor an impostor. The father of...