Skip to main content

Natasha Lyonne



Spoiler. I don't know how to really talk about a show without spoiling.

I read the New Yorker profile of Natasha Bianca Lyonne Braunstein and that made me want to give Russian Doll another try. I didn't really think all the quips and lines were that great, but I get it that she's a kind of enfant terrible of New York now. I heard the line, "Nothing is easy except peeing in the shower." I didn't really know her background and career until Orange Is The New Black, and I didn't really pay attention when I watched through this show the first time. Sometimes it takes a profile in the New Yorker to get someone.

She said this line too fast in episode 5: "Sexualizing self hatred is the hallmark of any relationship that begins with extramarital infidelity."

There was an interesting theory, that art sucks now because all the interesting critics died during the AIDS Crisis of the 80's. 

The show is like her, jaded, mostly mundane but occasionally interesting. I want to get to know her--is an equal proportion for the knowledge that I must stay away from her chaos.

This show follows Groundhog Day, I'm not sure what the precursor to that is. Even though Nadia Vulvokov is skeptical of the idea, she acts on trying to add positive energy to the world while she tries to figure out what is going on. 

I like "sex pile" and, "looks like someone threw a gauntlet into my pusepuse." (S1E6)

Fruit is rotting, so somehow time is passing with fruit, despite the resets. That's a kind of foreshadowing that it's not going to be stuck. The wheels come off in episode 7. But then things change, and there's a resolution. It conforms to the Groundhog Day expectation that a certain line of ethical behavior will end the loop.

Chag sameach means happy festival, or happy holidays. Lyonne lived in Israel for a while with her family.

The profile didn't give out the information that she was in a relationship with Fred Armisen. (source). They broke up because he didn't want a pool and she did. I love that.

Season 2 has a different frame. Instead of a Groundhog day repeat of the possibilities of the same day, she travels back to 1982. And she’s her pregnant mom. She goes back and solves various problems. What the hell is happening? How can I get my money back? She rewriting her mother's reckless behavior. She investigates her past. Again, the violating of the time space continuum starts to break things down. Scary insects are in her body.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

movie versus book

I'm watching the movie a second time, and I'm halfway through the book. Among the movie's differences from the book. Sortilege starts off narrating. The movie doesn't have the school bell for the phone either, just a regular ring. It's really weird the way Doc shouts when he sees the photo of Amethyst as a baby. I guess it's to dramatize the negative impact of being pregnant and using, but the child we see looks pretty healthy. The child doesn't huff out because they're boring like she did in the book.  Superficially The Big Lebowski and Inherent Vice are similar but it's a completely different style of narrative. The Coen brothers are amazing, they have a very witty movie that I have loved for a long time. Pynchon is a whole other realm of fiction, and this conversion is fairly faithful, taking out the best lines and making it more compact. The audio book is 15 hours, the movie is 2 hours. Anyway, I like the different movies for different reasons. T...

Introduction

Robert B. Palmer's introduction to his translation of Walter F. Otto's Dionysus: Myth and Cult (p. ix-xi) Gods of Hellas, gods of Hellas, Can ye listen in your silence? Can your mystic voices tell us Where ye hide? In floating islands,  With a wind that evermore Keeps you out of sight of shore?                                     Pan, Pan is dead. ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING The Dead Pan W H E N Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote these lines which sound so pessimistic and so limited to any lover of the beauty and truth of Greek mythology, she had in mind a famous passage out of Plutarch's De Oraculorum defectu {Mor. 419 A-E) in which it was reported on good authority that Pan had died. But let Plutarch tell the story (Philip is speaking):  As for death among such beings [i.e., deities], I have heard the words of a man who was not a fool nor an impostor. The father of...