Skip to main content

Franny and Zooey

It's a rainy day, I was wondering what I could look forward to as I walked home from dropping off my daughter at school. I thought about how Zooey tries to articulate preciousness, how she dislike Freudian analysis, how she dislikes English professors that dismantle a text, and sell it for parts. Her boyfriend Lane is on top of the world, he got an A for a paper about the need for masculinity in fiction, a friend wanted him to publish it. Lane punctures his good feeling, he had the right girl at the right place for lunch and he was feeling great for his defense of masculinity being rewarded with an A, and Zooey just isn't buying it, and he loses that special feeling he had. 

Maybe I'll read some more, but I wonder if you can really neutralize criticism with that start of a novel. 

I watched Carrie Pilby, and she says that's a favorite book she likes to read. The movie is about a prodigy who graduated from college at 19 and was lost. She's seeing a psychotherapist. Nathan Lane plays a philandering hetrosexual psychotherapist. 

He's trying to get Carrie to be more social, less enclosed. She read 17 books in a day. Gabriel Byrne is her father. Those two right there make a film for me. I love it that it's a woman director. I read an article headline that more romance novels need to be adapted to film. I like Bridgerton, but I'm stalled in my first season rewatch to get to the new second season. I wanted a palate cleanser after watching Florida Project. That's a pretty good balance, realism and romance, realism and romance.

You can tell that Zooey could almost be against phoniness like Holden Caulfield. I wondered at the 3 book output of Jerome David Salinger. The little things I know from his biography, the lurid stuff comes through without having to read the book. He died 12 years ago.

The quest for the non-phony authentic life is real. The desire for re-enchantment after disenchantment. 202 pages of struggling to be real. Franny and Zooey is a fun book, I remember laughing when Franny throws a thrashing tantrum in the bath to be left alone.

Franny and Zooey came out in 1961. Updike liked it, but someone I'd never heard of before didn't like it. 

In my head non-phoniness is trying not to be absurd. I don't think a human can contain all the truths, so try as we might to not be absurd, hypocritical, we will inevitably be phony.

Everyone is having a breakdown, seems like they should be monks they want to be so pure and have such a refined life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

movie versus book

I'm watching the movie a second time, and I'm halfway through the book. Among the movie's differences from the book. Sortilege starts off narrating. The movie doesn't have the school bell for the phone either, just a regular ring. It's really weird the way Doc shouts when he sees the photo of Amethyst as a baby. I guess it's to dramatize the negative impact of being pregnant and using, but the child we see looks pretty healthy. The child doesn't huff out because they're boring like she did in the book.  Superficially The Big Lebowski and Inherent Vice are similar but it's a completely different style of narrative. The Coen brothers are amazing, they have a very witty movie that I have loved for a long time. Pynchon is a whole other realm of fiction, and this conversion is fairly faithful, taking out the best lines and making it more compact. The audio book is 15 hours, the movie is 2 hours. Anyway, I like the different movies for different reasons. T...

The case for Harris

Motley Kamuka Blog endorses Kamala Harris. In general, Trump just wants to lower taxes on the rich, and do nothing, sell whatever influence he can to line his pockets. Apparently the emoluments clause in the constitution has no teeth. Harris has a set of ideas about policy that are fairly middle of the road. In most countries she's would be seen as a centrist. Spin about her radical agendas are exaggerated.  I'm not sure how he got past " grab them by the pussy ", but he did and here we are. Women: Obviously the idea of giving women pregnancy tests at the borders of the state, and then if they come back and don't have a baby, they go to jail, isn't really what most women want. Pick Harris.  I understand if you think abortion is murder, maybe you've been told that by the Catholic church, which has the same ideal of Buddhism that you don't kill--so follow your religion for yourself. Not everyone is Christian or Buddhist or even has a religion. Women are ...