Skip to main content

Carnival barkers



I get that it's news when these asshats say something stupid, ("can you believe this!") but what if we didn't give them press for attention getting behaviors that don't add anything to the common discourse. It's not being balanced and fair to add the attention getting, Russian sponsored perspective. If we can't figure out how to not allow them to get Russian money, or dark money, can't we just not give them a platform. At this point their stupidity isn't news.

The right wing conspiracy is dark money from Koch, from Russia, virtually the same thing. Hunter Biden's story is nothing compared to the grift of the Trumps. To think it's a story is to make a political choice, not an objective fair balanced choice. 

It's not fair and equal to undermine American democracy. The 4th branch, the press, really needs to tighten things up for the midterm elections. The people who vote for these asshats and carnival barkers see the lurid attention as validation and "strategy" and legitimate political discourse. 

I'm moving forward by not clicking on any article that doesn't have an Ashoka like change. I'm not going to retweet or tweet their ashattery. 

I think certain people deserve to be canceled. That only half of the political spectrum can "cancel" someone is a joke. Everyone can do a blog and air their thoughts. It's not a right to post racist things on platforms. In a way I might want to known what was said that was considered racist. And a black man being racist towards another black man is interesting. But really, I'm not going to go find out, because I don't care about lurid attention whores. It shames whores, which I don't mean to shame. 

Obvious harmful speech is to be deplatformed. But we have this idea of providing even coverage, that allows these people to say horrible things. That there are very few Republicans saying reasonable things is their problem. 

I find it sickening that vaccines were politicized. In a way it seems like comments are amplified. The right's outrage about making Stacey Abrams the president on Earth in a scifi show, I didn't even notice it. I only noticed the outrage at the outrage. As if Star Trek wasn't already a show about the liberal future where there is no longer money, and people are expected to be tolerant of other species. The right is focusing on the culture war at the expense of policy debates.

If you're unclear what is wrong with autocracies, read this article by David Brooks.

It's hard not to want to list these asshats for what they are doing wrong.

Here is a list of bought and sold Russian sympathizers:

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia

Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida

Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky

Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona

Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina

Rep. Glenn Grothman of Wisconsin

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas

source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Character list of Inherent Vice the novel

Fay "Shasta" Hepworth played by Katherine Waterston in the 2014 movie Larry "Doc" Sportello: Our hero, gumsandal.  Shasta Fay Hepworth: Former beautiful love interest. Mickey Wolfmann: Real estate tycoon, Shasta's sugar daddy, paying for apartment in Hancock Park. Mrs. Sloane Wolfmann: wife. Has her own side piece Mr. Riggs Warbling Deputy DA Penny Kimball: lawyer from district attorney office, who fooled around with Doc for a time. Works next to Rhus Frothingham (female book, male in movie).  Aunt Reet: Aunt in real estate. "Bigfoot" Christian Bjornsen: Hollywood detective and actor. Married to Chastity. Spoiler: His partner Vincent Indelicato is wacked by Adrian Prussia, but Puck did the actual job. Mrs. Chastity Bjornsen: Gets on the phone on page 260 of the paperback to defend Bigfoot's day off from work. Calls Doc Mr. Moral Turpitude, accuses him of running up Bigfoot's mental health bills.  Denis: friend who he goes and gets a pizza with

Democracy or democrazy?

Admittedly the choice between corrupt democrats and corrupt republicans isn't the political choice I want. I'd rather vote my way towards fairness, elimination of poverty, anti-trust laws that fight the consolidation of corporations (you read about grocery stores lately?), education, infrastructure. What you do get is a vote for democrats that vote to end rail strikes ( source ) because they can't carve out of the profits a sick leave, versus reality denying, Russian bought, obstructionists who might lower taxes, and want smaller government. The Ron Swanson's of the world who hate government and work in government. I've been running into people who believe the corrupt choices aren't worth even making. Reasons not to pay attention.I've thought that a few times in my life, but I don't think that now.  There are real choices about health care for women, and even just an attitude towards democracy. It's hard to fight past the rhetoric, and understand eve

Consent

You couldn't have a better title to a memoir in these times. You can read about Humbert Humbert, and other male narratives, but the female narrative of the statutory rape is fulfilled by this book. I feel slightly ill while reading this book. What she goes through is off, and it's hard to put a finger on it besides  Hebephilia . All the collaborating details from her mother, to her doctors, to her father. Vanessa Springora will be remembered for other things, she is a director and a publisher. I'm not sure if  Gabriel Matzneff will be remembered for other things. At least not on this side of the pond. I do have a kind of jealousy for the appreciation of the intellectual life in France.  Matzneff cites Lewis Carroll , and others as having the appreciation for youth. I read his Wikipedia page. That led to other questions about photographers who take pictures of their children. That led me down a creepy path. As much as Springora tries to not make it sexy, I wonder how many