Skip to main content

Carnival barkers



I get that it's news when these asshats say something stupid, ("can you believe this!") but what if we didn't give them press for attention getting behaviors that don't add anything to the common discourse. It's not being balanced and fair to add the attention getting, Russian sponsored perspective. If we can't figure out how to not allow them to get Russian money, or dark money, can't we just not give them a platform. At this point their stupidity isn't news.

The right wing conspiracy is dark money from Koch, from Russia, virtually the same thing. Hunter Biden's story is nothing compared to the grift of the Trumps. To think it's a story is to make a political choice, not an objective fair balanced choice. 

It's not fair and equal to undermine American democracy. The 4th branch, the press, really needs to tighten things up for the midterm elections. The people who vote for these asshats and carnival barkers see the lurid attention as validation and "strategy" and legitimate political discourse. 

I'm moving forward by not clicking on any article that doesn't have an Ashoka like change. I'm not going to retweet or tweet their ashattery. 

I think certain people deserve to be canceled. That only half of the political spectrum can "cancel" someone is a joke. Everyone can do a blog and air their thoughts. It's not a right to post racist things on platforms. In a way I might want to known what was said that was considered racist. And a black man being racist towards another black man is interesting. But really, I'm not going to go find out, because I don't care about lurid attention whores. It shames whores, which I don't mean to shame. 

Obvious harmful speech is to be deplatformed. But we have this idea of providing even coverage, that allows these people to say horrible things. That there are very few Republicans saying reasonable things is their problem. 

I find it sickening that vaccines were politicized. In a way it seems like comments are amplified. The right's outrage about making Stacey Abrams the president on Earth in a scifi show, I didn't even notice it. I only noticed the outrage at the outrage. As if Star Trek wasn't already a show about the liberal future where there is no longer money, and people are expected to be tolerant of other species. The right is focusing on the culture war at the expense of policy debates.

If you're unclear what is wrong with autocracies, read this article by David Brooks.

It's hard not to want to list these asshats for what they are doing wrong.

Here is a list of bought and sold Russian sympathizers:

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia

Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida

Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky

Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona

Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina

Rep. Glenn Grothman of Wisconsin

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas

source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

The case for Harris

Motley Kamuka Blog endorses Kamala Harris. In general, Trump just wants to lower taxes on the rich, and do nothing, sell whatever influence he can to line his pockets. Apparently the emoluments clause in the constitution has no teeth. Harris has a set of ideas about policy that are fairly middle of the road. In most countries she's would be seen as a centrist. Spin about her radical agendas are exaggerated.  I'm not sure how he got past " grab them by the pussy ", but he did and here we are. Women: Obviously the idea of giving women pregnancy tests at the borders of the state, and then if they come back and don't have a baby, they go to jail, isn't really what most women want. Pick Harris.  I understand if you think abortion is murder, maybe you've been told that by the Catholic church, which has the same ideal of Buddhism that you don't kill--so follow your religion for yourself. Not everyone is Christian or Buddhist or even has a religion. Women are ...

Gravity's Rainbow Notes Franz Pokler

From pp 397-433: Franz Pokler , a German rocket scientist. He is marginally associated with early attempts to develop rockets in the 1920's. During the war, Weissmann controls Pokler, giving him routine assignments and keeping him in line by allowing him yearly visits from a girl who he says is Pokler's daughter. The girl spends the rest of the year in a concentration camp, and Weissmann's implied threat is that she will be killed if Pokler fails to cooperate with Weissmann's scheme. Weissmann's purpose is to use Pokler to make one small part for the A4 rocket. In the end, having performed his task, Pokler is released; Slothrop meets him living quietly in the ruins of a children's village after the end of the war. His daughter also survives. Wiki notes on the Franz Pokler section 397-433 Abstract of "Franz Pökler's Anti-Story: Narrative and Self in Gravity's Rainbow" by Robert L. McLaughlin. (access the article  here  from  Pynchon Notes ) Gra...