Skip to main content

What to read?

 What to read?

There are so many things I could follow up on with the Margaret Fuller biography: Goethe, Shelly, Wordsworth, and other romantics. Or the last poets she hung out with before she left for America, and eventually died off the shores of Fire Island: Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Robert Browning. Or the Polish poet Adam Mickiewicz. Or Waldo Emerson and Thoreau's poetry? Or the anti-Transcendentalist Edgar Allen Poe. Or some of the lesser transcendentalist poets or the Fireside poets? I could totally go off on a huge poetry tangent. 

Or do I read history about the founding of Roman Republic in 1949, and wonder what Fuller's book would have been like?

Or do I read the feminist that come out of the Seneca Falls Women's Rights conference, which she might have headlined in 1850?

I'm probably going to read Nature by Emerson because that's where the group went. The cool thing about reading the Transcendentalists is that everything is available at gutenberg.org.

I've got a biography of the group by Carlos Baker which the group recommends. I read the Cheever book against their recommendation because I got it too late, I was committed to finish it. But it's cool to run things by the hive mind. I'm also grateful to the library because I still prefer old technology books, as opposed to electronic readers. I'm going to be reading Nature on an iPad, but I do have a collected works of Emerson, and 2 copies of Walden, and Dickinson's poems and a biography of her I will make sure to read during this year.

I really liked James Shapiro's Shakespeare in a Divided America. I'm tempted to follow up on the Astor Place Riots.

I'm also reading Goldberg's book on haiku.

I'm also still working on Obama's presidential autobiography.

And a book on grief.

Those are just the most recently read book, I have older ones I've abandoned, and my stack of To Read, and my stack of Reread. And all my other interests! 

I read 2 pages of the Connected Discourse every day, and a Shakespeare sonnet.

The Dickinson group is reading Oliver Twist, which I have a copy close by a hard copy. 

What to do, what to do?


And then I find the Natalie Portman book club!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

movie versus book

I'm watching the movie a second time, and I'm halfway through the book. Among the movie's differences from the book. Sortilege starts off narrating. The movie doesn't have the school bell for the phone either, just a regular ring. It's really weird the way Doc shouts when he sees the photo of Amethyst as a baby. I guess it's to dramatize the negative impact of being pregnant and using, but the child we see looks pretty healthy. The child doesn't huff out because they're boring like she did in the book.  Superficially The Big Lebowski and Inherent Vice are similar but it's a completely different style of narrative. The Coen brothers are amazing, they have a very witty movie that I have loved for a long time. Pynchon is a whole other realm of fiction, and this conversion is fairly faithful, taking out the best lines and making it more compact. The audio book is 15 hours, the movie is 2 hours. Anyway, I like the different movies for different reasons. T...

The case for Harris

Motley Kamuka Blog endorses Kamala Harris. In general, Trump just wants to lower taxes on the rich, and do nothing, sell whatever influence he can to line his pockets. Apparently the emoluments clause in the constitution has no teeth. Harris has a set of ideas about policy that are fairly middle of the road. In most countries she's would be seen as a centrist. Spin about her radical agendas are exaggerated.  I'm not sure how he got past " grab them by the pussy ", but he did and here we are. Women: Obviously the idea of giving women pregnancy tests at the borders of the state, and then if they come back and don't have a baby, they go to jail, isn't really what most women want. Pick Harris.  I understand if you think abortion is murder, maybe you've been told that by the Catholic church, which has the same ideal of Buddhism that you don't kill--so follow your religion for yourself. Not everyone is Christian or Buddhist or even has a religion. Women are ...