Skip to main content

Liberals and Conservatives

A liberal doesn't want to contain caring. A conservative puts a limit, a boundary on caring. Not at the federal level, rarely in government. They want to be free of government interference, trust the survival of the fittest games. Only care for the inner tribe, maybe only the nuclear tribe, maybe only yourself. Trust that selfishness isn't as evil as you would think. People will try and shame you for not thinking of others, but that is their hangup. The energy you release by just focusing on yourself is important. The energy you waste thinking about abstractions is a waste. All those liberal tears that Trump drank made him stronger to push forward his case. That is why he won't give up on saying the election was a fraud. Somewhere in there is some kind of mistake seam that he can exploit to his 70 million followers

Here is a post a conservative friend wrote: "I have no problem with calls for unity and coming together as Americans. In fact, I approve wholeheartedly. I just wonder why we only hear them after a democrat wins."

I wrote "One of the sources of liberal tears that made Trump stronger was the angst at his permissions for separatist movements, his saying he was only president to red states. A liberal always wants unity, and that is what often offends the conservative who likes to point out they exist, and think differently. A conservative is always going to point to the made up conceits of liberals like unity. A liberal is always going to see the joy of unity, like some Borg collective that only thinks liberal thoughts. Conservatives will think it's made up because it is." I would add capricious and arbitrary. I'd just rather live in that Borg cube.  

The endless debate of politics because the perspectives have flaws and the opposition can always point out those flaws. Like a parent who can point out mistakes a child makes. Like there could be some final victory where one perspective wins. It's all a projection of personality. Some people like the ideas of liberalism. Some people find them made up, fake, false, impossible, wasteful. They are more grounded and practical, open to the dark side. The Trump Campaign even called their offices the Death Star, leaning into liberal mythologies. 

Politics can be so much more fun than the question, what should I do with my life, and how can I improve my situation?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Character list of Inherent Vice the novel

Fay "Shasta" Hepworth played by Katherine Waterston in the 2014 movie Larry "Doc" Sportello: Our hero, gumsandal.  Shasta Fay Hepworth: Former beautiful love interest. Mickey Wolfmann: Real estate tycoon, Shasta's sugar daddy, paying for apartment in Hancock Park. Mrs. Sloane Wolfmann: wife. Has her own side piece Mr. Riggs Warbling Deputy DA Penny Kimball: lawyer from district attorney office, who fooled around with Doc for a time. Works next to Rhus Frothingham (female book, male in movie).  Aunt Reet: Aunt in real estate. "Bigfoot" Christian Bjornsen: Hollywood detective and actor. Married to Chastity. Spoiler: His partner Vincent Indelicato is wacked by Adrian Prussia, but Puck did the actual job. Mrs. Chastity Bjornsen: Gets on the phone on page 260 of the paperback to defend Bigfoot's day off from work. Calls Doc Mr. Moral Turpitude, accuses him of running up Bigfoot's mental health bills.  Denis: friend who he goes and gets a pizza with...

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

6 month old podcast

Al Franken has a podcast , and he has my favorite Heather Cox Richardson , and they have an interesting discussion. He talks about the knife edge. She really explains the Republican strategy. Flood the zone with shit. Alternate facts, and fake news opens up the idea that there is no reality. It's basically reality versus false reality.  The goal is to both get people to back away from politics, and to tell them how to specifically think. Developed in Russia, a system of overturning democracy. Running fake candidates, who switch parties, and running candidates with the same name. Blackmail is a technique. Create a fake reality that people come to believe. They're willing to vote for a narrative is not true, and they're willing to vote away their rights.  You can flip it and use the same tools.You can weaponize social media by ignoring the shit, and fight back against all these techniques. People defend democracy. They're talking about community and caring for people and ...