Skip to main content

Maggie O'Farrell's Hamnet

I've been dying to read Hamnet by Maggie O'Farrell, and I got it from my library.

Hamnet is of course the name of the twin born to Anne Hathaway and William Shakespeare. His twin was Judith. Turns out there is a novel about Judith written by William Black in 1884.

I read the novel. There are assumptions being made. Are they based in facts or made up to flesh it out? By a quarter of the novel I am hooked in. The chapters move back and forth in time. I want to read reviews and interviews, but I don't want to contaminate my first reading of the novel.

Spoiler Alert! If you haven't read the novel, skip to links.

I have read three quarters of the novel and my feeling is this: what Shakespeare's life was like is a projection of us. We know so little. O'Farrell has created a caring loving relationship with Anne Hathaway. Anne is called Agnes, and she is part wild, part witch, in tune with the natural cures, and even goes into the woods to have a baby. She knows all the homeopathic cures. She is very sensitive to others, and assertive. Shakespeare goes pale, is depressed not knowing what to do. He goes off to London to sell gloves, but finds the theater. He comes alive, but she stays in Stratford. His father is very harsh, violent, brutal. But she stays with his family in Stratford, in town. 

O'Farrell has 3 children. She does not want to imagine one of her children dying of the plague, but she writes it. What a lovely projection of her own sensitivities, imagining into Shakespearian space. In a way, this is a thought experiment from a woman who wrote a 2017 memoir I Am, I Am, I Am, that you could read and know as much about her, as through the novel.

She guesses at the 7 years of fallow time where we know nothing about Shakespeare--Shakespeare was a Latin tutor and ran errands for his father. He goes to London to sell gloves, and gets a contract with a acting troupe, but falls in love with the theater. Agnes stays in Stratford because Judith is sickly. 

Instead of seeing Anne Hathaway as anything negative, O'Farrell is “a feminist avenging angel” and makes her more interesting than Shakespeare. She imagines the marriage as a partnership. William knows about herbs from Agnes, he knows about falconry from Agnes.

According to the Guardian interview, she use the language of the times, and wouldn't use any terms that were modern. While I didn't really feel like she captured the rich language of Shakespeare or any of his poetry, she did inhabit the language of the times. The novel should be titled Agnes, not Hamnet. She has a kind of psychic sight, and sees hidden depths in him. 

I imagine O'Farrell writing at a desk with a map of Stratford in those times, with lists of herbs, with lists of words that retain their meaning into today and words that have changed, and won't be used the way they are today.

The novel has given me a new interpretation of Hamlet. Hamlet is inactive because he is dead. Hamlet died at age 11, leaving his twin sister Judith to live. A widow is a person in a marriage who has survived. When your parents die, you are an orphan. When another twin dies, there is no word for it, but must be worthy of a word. Hamlet is inactive because he is himself a ghost, that is why he can see other ghosts. 

Well, I'm against such tendentious interpretations, I prefer close readings that obliterate wild interpretations, but this one sprung to my mind thinking more about the death of a child, which is the central action of this novel. 

Like a good novelist, the novel ends in a thrilling drama. I won't spoil that though. I thought it was a really good novel and I was glad I read it. It imagines into their lives, and while there's no basis for any of the speculation there is a modern wondering and filling in of the blanks. There could be a million different filling in the blanks, and this one isn't bad.

In a totally irrelevant sidenote, O'Farrell's husband wrote Otherhood, which was turned into a movie on Netflix by other people. Just watching the preview, 3 mothers go into Manhattan to see their grown children on Mother's day, and have an adventure.


Links:

Maggie O'Farrell Wikipedia

Personal Website

Hamnet Shakespeare Wikipedia

Book Wikipedia

Guardian Interview

Times Review

NPR Review

Washington Post

Guardian1

Guardian2

LA Times

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

The case for Harris

Motley Kamuka Blog endorses Kamala Harris. In general, Trump just wants to lower taxes on the rich, and do nothing, sell whatever influence he can to line his pockets. Apparently the emoluments clause in the constitution has no teeth. Harris has a set of ideas about policy that are fairly middle of the road. In most countries she's would be seen as a centrist. Spin about her radical agendas are exaggerated.  I'm not sure how he got past " grab them by the pussy ", but he did and here we are. Women: Obviously the idea of giving women pregnancy tests at the borders of the state, and then if they come back and don't have a baby, they go to jail, isn't really what most women want. Pick Harris.  I understand if you think abortion is murder, maybe you've been told that by the Catholic church, which has the same ideal of Buddhism that you don't kill--so follow your religion for yourself. Not everyone is Christian or Buddhist or even has a religion. Women are ...

Gravity's Rainbow Notes Franz Pokler

From pp 397-433: Franz Pokler , a German rocket scientist. He is marginally associated with early attempts to develop rockets in the 1920's. During the war, Weissmann controls Pokler, giving him routine assignments and keeping him in line by allowing him yearly visits from a girl who he says is Pokler's daughter. The girl spends the rest of the year in a concentration camp, and Weissmann's implied threat is that she will be killed if Pokler fails to cooperate with Weissmann's scheme. Weissmann's purpose is to use Pokler to make one small part for the A4 rocket. In the end, having performed his task, Pokler is released; Slothrop meets him living quietly in the ruins of a children's village after the end of the war. His daughter also survives. Wiki notes on the Franz Pokler section 397-433 Abstract of "Franz Pökler's Anti-Story: Narrative and Self in Gravity's Rainbow" by Robert L. McLaughlin. (access the article  here  from  Pynchon Notes ) Gra...