Skip to main content

Maggie O'Farrell's Hamnet

I've been dying to read Hamnet by Maggie O'Farrell, and I got it from my library.

Hamnet is of course the name of the twin born to Anne Hathaway and William Shakespeare. His twin was Judith. Turns out there is a novel about Judith written by William Black in 1884.

I read the novel. There are assumptions being made. Are they based in facts or made up to flesh it out? By a quarter of the novel I am hooked in. The chapters move back and forth in time. I want to read reviews and interviews, but I don't want to contaminate my first reading of the novel.

Spoiler Alert! If you haven't read the novel, skip to links.

I have read three quarters of the novel and my feeling is this: what Shakespeare's life was like is a projection of us. We know so little. O'Farrell has created a caring loving relationship with Anne Hathaway. Anne is called Agnes, and she is part wild, part witch, in tune with the natural cures, and even goes into the woods to have a baby. She knows all the homeopathic cures. She is very sensitive to others, and assertive. Shakespeare goes pale, is depressed not knowing what to do. He goes off to London to sell gloves, but finds the theater. He comes alive, but she stays in Stratford. His father is very harsh, violent, brutal. But she stays with his family in Stratford, in town. 

O'Farrell has 3 children. She does not want to imagine one of her children dying of the plague, but she writes it. What a lovely projection of her own sensitivities, imagining into Shakespearian space. In a way, this is a thought experiment from a woman who wrote a 2017 memoir I Am, I Am, I Am, that you could read and know as much about her, as through the novel.

She guesses at the 7 years of fallow time where we know nothing about Shakespeare--Shakespeare was a Latin tutor and ran errands for his father. He goes to London to sell gloves, and gets a contract with a acting troupe, but falls in love with the theater. Agnes stays in Stratford because Judith is sickly. 

Instead of seeing Anne Hathaway as anything negative, O'Farrell is “a feminist avenging angel” and makes her more interesting than Shakespeare. She imagines the marriage as a partnership. William knows about herbs from Agnes, he knows about falconry from Agnes.

According to the Guardian interview, she use the language of the times, and wouldn't use any terms that were modern. While I didn't really feel like she captured the rich language of Shakespeare or any of his poetry, she did inhabit the language of the times. The novel should be titled Agnes, not Hamnet. She has a kind of psychic sight, and sees hidden depths in him. 

I imagine O'Farrell writing at a desk with a map of Stratford in those times, with lists of herbs, with lists of words that retain their meaning into today and words that have changed, and won't be used the way they are today.

The novel has given me a new interpretation of Hamlet. Hamlet is inactive because he is dead. Hamlet died at age 11, leaving his twin sister Judith to live. A widow is a person in a marriage who has survived. When your parents die, you are an orphan. When another twin dies, there is no word for it, but must be worthy of a word. Hamlet is inactive because he is himself a ghost, that is why he can see other ghosts. 

Well, I'm against such tendentious interpretations, I prefer close readings that obliterate wild interpretations, but this one sprung to my mind thinking more about the death of a child, which is the central action of this novel. 

Like a good novelist, the novel ends in a thrilling drama. I won't spoil that though. I thought it was a really good novel and I was glad I read it. It imagines into their lives, and while there's no basis for any of the speculation there is a modern wondering and filling in of the blanks. There could be a million different filling in the blanks, and this one isn't bad.

In a totally irrelevant sidenote, O'Farrell's husband wrote Otherhood, which was turned into a movie on Netflix by other people. Just watching the preview, 3 mothers go into Manhattan to see their grown children on Mother's day, and have an adventure.


Links:

Maggie O'Farrell Wikipedia

Personal Website

Hamnet Shakespeare Wikipedia

Book Wikipedia

Guardian Interview

Times Review

NPR Review

Washington Post

Guardian1

Guardian2

LA Times

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manet and Degas

  Brilliant video explaining the exhibit. Go to the Met and see the exhibit! It's really quite special.  In the last gallery the painting this sketch is based off of, of the execution of a Mexican president. The painting has been cut into sections, and the surviving Degas has reassembled them. NY Times review

movie versus book

I'm watching the movie a second time, and I'm halfway through the book. Among the movie's differences from the book. Sortilege starts off narrating. The movie doesn't have the school bell for the phone either, just a regular ring. It's really weird the way Doc shouts when he sees the photo of Amethyst as a baby. I guess it's to dramatize the negative impact of being pregnant and using, but the child we see looks pretty healthy. The child doesn't huff out because they're boring like she did in the book.  Superficially The Big Lebowski and Inherent Vice are similar but it's a completely different style of narrative. The Coen brothers are amazing, they have a very witty movie that I have loved for a long time. Pynchon is a whole other realm of fiction, and this conversion is fairly faithful, taking out the best lines and making it more compact. The audio book is 15 hours, the movie is 2 hours. Anyway, I like the different movies for different reasons. T...

Introduction

Robert B. Palmer's introduction to his translation of Walter F. Otto's Dionysus: Myth and Cult (p. ix-xi) Gods of Hellas, gods of Hellas, Can ye listen in your silence? Can your mystic voices tell us Where ye hide? In floating islands,  With a wind that evermore Keeps you out of sight of shore?                                     Pan, Pan is dead. ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING The Dead Pan W H E N Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote these lines which sound so pessimistic and so limited to any lover of the beauty and truth of Greek mythology, she had in mind a famous passage out of Plutarch's De Oraculorum defectu {Mor. 419 A-E) in which it was reported on good authority that Pan had died. But let Plutarch tell the story (Philip is speaking):  As for death among such beings [i.e., deities], I have heard the words of a man who was not a fool nor an impostor. The father of...